Sunday, June 12, 2016

Best Practices in Marketing

I recently viewed a video posted on the Ad Club. In the video, the Vice Presidents of marketing for the Boston Bruins, the Boston Celtics and the Boston Red Sox were interviewed. It was a panel discussion about the best practices in marketing. There were two points that resonated with me; the emotional component in marketing a venue or a team and marketing to the different types of sports watchers.

Adam Grossman, SVP, Marketing and Brand Management for the Boston Red Sox and Fenway Sports Management, was asked to speak about the, “at home [sports] experience vs. the in stadium experience.” I found his comments about the emotional and historical component of Fenway Park very interesting. The park is the oldest park in Major League Baseball at 104 years old. It is that history that can not be duplicated at home or through technology, that brings fans to the stadium. Grossman stated, “the TV experience is so different from walking up and seeing the green of Fenway for the first time.” Fenway has the added benefit of being both a sports venue and a tourist attraction. Not many teams have the benefit of having a venue with a historical background. Most teams are trying to figure out how to market their team to the array of ages and tastes.

Matt Griffin, VP of Strategic Marketing and Business Operations for the Boston Celtics, was also on the panel and said it best when he said, “You have to know your fans and know how to customize that experience. You have 19,000 fans and 19,000 reasons why they are there.” You have the fan that attends a game, buys food from the concession stand, watches the game, and never takes their phone out of their pocket. You have the other fan that tends to be younger and may spend the entire game on their phone.  They may be uploading photos from the game, talking to other sports fans on social media or checking out their fantasy league. Teams have to customize the experience to the 2 different types of sports watchers in the venue, as well as customize the experience for the at home watcher. They have to make sure that the experiences remain the same.

When marketing a team, you have to have a multi level plan. You have to keep your current and loyal fan base engaged, you have to reach new and younger fans and you have to keep up with the latest trends in technology. Keeping these 3 things in mind will also help with selling the team to sponsors. When you have a gem like Fenway Park or Madison Square Garden, you have an added benefit to use and sell to both the sports fans and sponsors, a historical and emotional connection to that City.

Reference:





Sunday, May 8, 2016

Intellectual Property & The Law

Operating a crisis management firm will take many twists and turns and a variety of cases. Most clients seeking our services will deal with the dynamic of "right" versus "wrong". Unfortunately, it will not always be that simple. Right versus wrong will be decided under the law, not emotion. Here are 3 examples of such cases:

Jason Pierre-Paul of the New York Giants vs. Adam Schefter and ESPN. Pierre-Paul lost his index finger in an accident stemming from playing with fireworks. Four months prior to the accident, the New York Giants placed a $60 million franchise tag on Pierre-Paul, that he had not signed at the time of the accident. Schefter posted Pierre-Paul’s medical chart showing the amputated finger on his Twitter feed. Pierre-Paul is suing Schefter and ESPN for violating his privacy as well as the Florida medical privacy statute. At the heart of this issue is privacy. Did Schefter violate privacy laws by posting the photo? If I were advising Pierre-Paul, I would suggest that he conduct his own investigation as to how Schefter received the medical records and sue that person or the hospital. I would have suggested he do that before filing a lawsuit against ESPN and Schefter. I would not immediately have suggested suing ESPN. While he is suing under breach of privacy, there is a deeper ethical issue that can impact many more people. If someone affiliated with the hospital or doctor’s office is giving out patients' medical charts, that is a deeper and bigger issue in my opinion. The real question is, “What does Pierre-Paul want from ESPN?” Was he suing because he thought that once the accident happened the New York Giants were going to not only remove the franchise tag from him, but drop him as a player? The Giants not only kept him as a player, but after a bad season, signed him for another year. In my opinion, he may have thought his football career was over, and was trying to compensate for future lost wages by suing the massive media company. The question still needs to be answered, “What does Pierre-Paul want?”

Rentmeester vs. Nike, Inc. In 1984, Jacobus Rentmeester, a photographer, took a picture of North Carolina Tarheel superstar Michael Jordan for Life Magazine. The photo is of Jordan flying through the air on his way to the basketball hoop. During this time, Nike was negotiating an endorsement deal with Jordan. Nike reached out to Rentmeester during the negotiations to borrow the photo. Rentmeester loaned the photo to Nike for $150.00, under the condition that the photo not be used for “layout or any other duplication.” Months later, Nike used it again. It was considered breach of their agreement. Rentmeester and Nike, Inc. agreed to a 2 year limited license, allowing Nike to use it. They paid Rentmeester $15,000. Three years after the iconic photo was taken, Nike began using what is now known as the “Jumpman” logo on all of their merchandise, without compensation to Rentmeester. The issue is: Did Nike use the photo taken by Rentmeester to create the Jumpman logo? The next question is what action should Rentmeester take to rectify the situation? If Rentmeester sought my advice, my first question would be, “Did you copyright the photo?” My second question would be, “At what stage of this process did you involve a lawyer?” My third question to him would be, “Do you own the copyright on the photo or does Life magazine own it?” Copyright owners have the exclusive right to prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work. It is my opinion that something in the copyright process was not done correctly and that is the loophole that Nike found when they created the infamous Jumpman logo.   

Beyonce Knowles Carter vs. Feyonce, Inc. A company based in Texas trademarked the name “Feyonce.” The company used the trademark to create a fiancĂ©e inspired line of clothing and mugs. The mugs contain a popular line from Beyonce Knowles’ hit song “Single Ladies” using the line, “he put a ring on it.” Knowles is suing claiming “Feyonce” infringes on her trademarked name. I agree with Knowles. If the Texas based company was my client, I would suggest arbitration. I believe the case is unwinnable because of the combination of the name of the company and use of the song lyric. My reason for suggesting arbitration is in hopes that the Texas based company could enter a business partnership with Knowles and split the profits.


The 3 cases above deal with 3 different forms of legal liabilities, privacy, copyright and infringement.  While on the surface some of these cases do not seem fair, they deal with what is right under the law. When dealing with issues that involve one’s privacy or work they have created, those issues generate a lot of emotion. It is important to look at things from a legal perspective and not an emotional one. This perspective can save someone a lot of time and money.

Sunday, April 10, 2016

Fan Loyalty & Engagement

Everyone loves to support a winning team, but who supports the team when they are losing? The people who support their teams even when they are losing are called “loyal fans”. “During the good times and the bad, these fans are always there to show their support.”  Loyal fans contribute to an organization’s revenue. They pay for tickets to games, pay for parking at the venue, and pay for food at the venue all generating revenue, even when they are losing. Loyal fans are important to sports organizations because they “keep the lights on.” Teams are currently studying and coming up with new ways to increase fan loyalty and engagement.

Organizations are turning to technology to increase fan loyalty. A big issue at sport venues across the country is the lack of Wi-Fi access. People want to post video and/or post to their social media accounts showing what they are doing and where they are doing it. The new Sacramento Kings arena is scheduled to open in October 2016 and, "slated to be the techiest arena in the league.” Keeping the millennial in mind, the venue will be able to accommodate 500,000 snap chat posts per second. The Detroit Piston’s created a game day email that can be updated in real time every time you open it. Before the game, you can get real time stats on the players. During the game, when you have to go to the bathroom, and don’t want to walk away from the game, you can get real time score updates as you wait in line. The Detroit fans have responded favorably to the new email with 49% increased mobile engagement. For organizations trying to build more and keep their loyal fans in attendance, they must come up with creative ways to engage them before, during, and after the game.

There are various ways to engage fans. The Golden State Warriors have done a great job of engaging fans before the game. It is known that if you arrive to a Warriors game an hour and a half early, you will see Steph Curry put on a show with his 15 minute warm up routine. After his warm up, he takes the time to meet and greet with fans in the venue. This has spread from Warrior home games to road games as well. Allowing fans to watch the warm ups of their favorite team is something special to them, as it is not televised. Athletes taking the time to meet and greet with their fans is something special that money can’t buy. The gesture makes fans feel special. During the game, team's venues should be Wi-Fi accessible and able to handle the web traffic of the patrons. We live in a social media world. People want to document every aspect of what they are doing. After the game, some organizations produce small concerts with major artists to entertain fans. The Detroit Piston’s organization has a real time travel map to give you the quickest route in and out of the venue, so you can avoid sitting in long traffic lines and get home quickly.

Organizations go through winning and losing streaks. It is important that organizations keep their loyal fans engaged during both the good times and the bad times. Loyal fans tend to pass their habits on to their children. If you ask most people who their favorite team is and why, they will probably tell you that they grew up watching that team with their parent. You can almost say loyalty is hereditary. With this next generation of loyal fans, organizations must incorporate technology. The next generation rarely sits still. They are constantly multi tasking on their phones. If organizations do not give them the ability to use their phones at the venue, they could risk losing a generation of fans and risk losing money in attendance.

References:

Wagner, K. (2016, January 6). The Sacramento Kings are building the NBA’s techiest
            arena, a 21st century coliseum. Recode.net. Retrieved from

Wander, E. (2016, April 6). The Detroit Piston’s are sending emails that change
            every time fans check them. Adweek.com. Retrieved from 

Yi, J. (2011, January 25). The value of the loyal fan. SportsNetworker.com.


Sunday, March 13, 2016

Armstrong Williams On The Art Of Negotiation

I recently attended an Influencers Brunch in Washington, D.C. honoring the CEO of Epic Records, L.A. Reid. I attended with the sole purpose of finding someone to interview for my Negotiation and Deal Making Master class assignment. The assignment was comprised of two parts; find someone who negotiates as a regular part of doing business, and build upon my professional presence in the entertainment, media, or sports industry. After 16 years in radio, I know a lot of people who negotiate and could have easily called anyone, but I wanted to be true to the assignment. As the brunch was winding down, Mr. Armstrong Williams stepped on stage to say a few words. My only knowledge of him to this point was based on the work he has done in politics. Armstrong Williams is a political commentator, author of a nationally syndicated conservative newspaper column, author of 2 books Beyond Blame and Reawakening Virtues. He is also the host of a daily radio show on Sirius/XM channel 126 and a nationally syndicated television program called, “The Right Side with Armstrong Williams.” As Mr. Williams spoke to the audience, I learned about his business side. He is the largest black television station owner in the United States. The Washington Post explained it as follows; “there are 12 stations in the entire country owned by women or someone who is not white. Williams holds seven of them.” After hearing him discuss his television stations, I approached him about my assignment. Owning 12 stations means a lot of negotiating had to take place. This made him the perfect person to talk to. For the purpose of this blog, we will focus on the specific assignment; discussing negotiation tactics.

Thinking back to a bad negotiation; whether the reason it was bad was the fault of you or the fault of the person you were negotiating with, what do you recall that made it a bad negotiation?

“Never had a bad deal. Why? Here is the deal about negotiations; the last thing you want to be is emotional. The best deal is the deal you can literally walk away from even if it’s a great deal. When you walk away from it, that’s the power. Most people, because of their greed, because of the stature they want, can not walk away from the deal. They feel that they have invested too much emotion, too much time, but the greatest weapon in a deal is the ability to walk away from a deal and I’ve walked away from many deals.”

Speaking of emotions, what do you do when you are negotiating with someone and they’re emotional?

“I love it. I want them emotional.”

So you don’t walk away? There isn’t a cooling off period?

“No.”

What do you like about them being emotional?

“They can’t think straight. They are not in a business mind. It says a lot about their experience, and negotiating tactics. You are at an advantage when someone is emotional. It’s just like in a relationship; people are emotional because they care too much. The person that cares the least has the power and the control in the relationship. It’s the same concept in business.”

So you like it that way? You’re not going to try and separate the emotion out of the negotiation, you’re going to leave it right there?

"Leave it right there."

Have you ever been part of a negotiation where dirty tricks were used? Deliberate deception, misrepresentation of the facts, psychological warfare?

(Laughter), “Of course, of course. Sometimes you learn new tactics about business. The one thing about dealing with people, who are icons of business, and the new generation that is coming along, you learn things you never knew before. Different concepts about technology.”

At this point, my mind is racing a little because I didn’t quite get the “text book” answer I was seeking. This portion of our conversation went into technology. It was not until the end of our interview this answer would come back to me in a way that made perfect sense.

How have you dealt with haggling during a negotiation?

“I go to Europe and the Middle East a lot, the Arabs love to negotiate. It is an art form for them. So I will sit with a friend who owns a piece of jewelry. I can sit for 4 hours and negotiate over a piece of jewelry because that kind of negotiation is one of respect. What you’re saying to them, because you have spent so much time negotiating, watching me haggle as I haggle, at the end of this negotiation you’re going to buy something. Maybe not that piece of jewelry, but you’re going to buy something out of respect. So that kind of discipline for me, which I have been doing for ages, has prepared me for that [haggling]. Sometimes what happens is, the longer you draw out the negotiations, people get tired, they may have other things that are pressing against them, toward the end of it they become exhausted it’s like working out. The exhaustion forces them to make concessions they never would have made in the first hour of the negotiation.”

Back to dirty tricks. Later in our discussion he made a statement that resonated with me when I went home and listened to the recorded session. He was discussing business failures and when he used the word "failure" he followed it with, “if you call them failures.” I went back to the section on dirty tricks and surmised what Mr. Williams was saying, is that there is something to be learned even when dirty tricks have been used. In order to learn the lesson, one would have to let go of the emotion they feel once they realize a dirty trick has been used on them and learn from the overall experience. In learning from the use of a dirty trick being implemented, they may learn something new and informative from it: it could be about technology used during the process, new information about the market, a new approach to use at a future negotiation, etc. They will also learn that when that trick is used on them again, not to fall for it. My goal in sitting down with Mr. Williams was to complete an assignment about deal making and negotiations. What I left with was much more. I learned about syndication deals in television, having multiple revenue streams, learning from your setbacks, having patience and integrity. As I was wrapping up our conversation, Mr. Williams left me with one more last great thought:

“The most important thing in business is your reputation and respect. People know that I am a fair negotiator and I sometimes negotiate where I take the kitchen, but before we sign the documents I’ll say, ‘look, you need to take part of this back.' For me, I just wanted to see how much I can get to the very end. My moral compass, my ethics and my principles will say I’m exploiting this person. At the end of the negotiation, when I get everything I want, then I give them everything they should have kept back. The things I probably would have done 20 years ago to get to where I am today, I can’t do now. Today, I am in a place of prosperity, and so a person to whom much is given, much is expected to give back. I, as a successful person, and somebody who is wise, blessed and has seen the world, is held to a different standard than somebody who is just making their way. So I can exploit people and take advantage of them, but I’m the person that should make sure that person realizes that not everybody is unethical, not everybody is greedy. You set a standard for them, for themselves going forward because they are the future. You have to grow them too; when it comes to morals, ethics, principles and values, that’s very important.”